Corporate Identity
We research whether the alleged sending entity exists, where it is registered, its apparent business activity and whether the corporate profile is consistent with the proposed transaction.
KTT Transaction Intelligence
Before you pay fees, open companies, travel, sign agreements or spend weeks dealing with intermediaries, find out whether the proposed KTT transaction survives independent scrutiny.
Financely investigates the sender, alleged sending institution, corporate entities, documents, transaction narrative and publicly verifiable claims using open-source intelligence and public records.
You receive a written report identifying what checks out, what cannot be verified and which claims materially undermine the credibility of the proposed transaction.
A convincing PDF package does not establish that the sender, banker, institution or money exists. The relevant question is whether independent information supports the claims being made.
Investigation Scope
The investigation is built around the specific claims made in your transaction rather than a generic KTT checklist.
We research whether the alleged sending entity exists, where it is registered, its apparent business activity and whether the corporate profile is consistent with the proposed transaction.
We check the legal identity, regulatory footprint and publicly verifiable presence of the institution said to be sending the funds.
We examine publicly available information concerning named directors, representatives, intermediaries and other material transaction participants.
We compare company names, addresses, bank details, dates, terminology and transaction claims across the material provided.
We examine available domain, website and public digital information where it helps test whether an alleged institution or corporate identity is credible.
We assess whether the transaction narrative, proposed amount, counterparties and payment claims make commercial sense when considered together.
The deliverable is a written KTT due diligence report designed to help you decide whether further time and money should be committed to the transaction.
Concise assessment of the transaction and the principal reasons supporting our conclusion.
Material facts that can be corroborated through independent research.
Contradictions, unverifiable claims, unusual structures and other issues that increase transaction risk.
Whether the evidence supports proceeding, obtaining additional verification or stopping further work.
Risk Conclusion
The report is written around the commercial decision in front of you: whether the available evidence justifies further engagement with the proposed transaction.
Public information is broadly consistent with the identities, institutions and transaction narrative presented to us. Bank-level verification may still be required.
Important elements cannot be independently established or the transaction contains inconsistencies requiring clarification before proceeding.
Independent information materially conflicts with the transaction narrative or indicates that key claims should not be relied upon without substantial additional evidence.
Open-Source Intelligence
Research depends on the jurisdictions and counterparties involved. We use lawful information sources relevant to the specific transaction.
| Source Category | What It Can Help Establish |
|---|---|
| Corporate Registries | Company existence, registration details, directors and filing history where publicly available. |
| Financial Regulators | Whether an alleged bank or financial institution appears in relevant licensing or supervisory records. |
| Sanctions Data | Whether material counterparties appear on relevant public sanctions lists. |
| Court and Public Records | Available legal, insolvency or enforcement information where relevant and lawfully accessible. |
| Domain and Web Data | Whether online infrastructure and digital claims are consistent with the identity being presented. |
| News and Adverse Information | Public reporting relevant to the entities, principals or alleged transaction. |
Scope
The report assesses whether available evidence supports or undermines the transaction story. Confirmation of an actual bank payment requires the appropriate institutional channels.
Investigation File
The initial checkout remains short. After payment, we can request the relevant transaction material required to complete the investigation.
| Information | Examples |
|---|---|
| Sender Details | Company name, jurisdiction, website, representatives and ownership information available to you. |
| Bank Details | Alleged sending bank, branch, banker names and any banking correspondence supplied. |
| Transaction Documents | Agreements, procedures, term sheets, payment instructions and related documents. |
| Communications | Relevant emails, messages or correspondence containing material claims. |
| Transaction Background | Amount, currency, stated purpose, relationship between the parties and what you have been asked to do next. |
KTT Verification
Before relying on claims about a sending institution, review our guide on verifying a genuine KTT sending bank.
We also maintain a failed KTT transfer case study covering common warning signs and a broader Key Tested Telex transfer guide.
If the Transaction Survives Review
Where the available evidence supports further work and the transaction meets onboarding requirements, qualified clients can subsequently engage Financely's KTT receiver service.
The due diligence report and receiving mandate are separate services. Purchasing this report does not guarantee that Financely or any financial institution will accept the transaction for execution.
Order Your Report
Submit the transaction details below. After the order is successfully recorded, you will be redirected to our bank details to complete the USD 1,000 payment.
The fixed price is USD 1,000 for one proposed transaction.
We assess the available evidence and identify material indicators supporting or undermining the transaction. Where independent evidence substantially conflicts with the claims being made, the report will state that clearly.
We can research the alleged institution against relevant public regulatory, corporate and other open-source information. Direct confirmation that a specific transfer will be sent requires appropriate bank-level verification.
The standard USD 1,000 product is an open-source desktop due diligence report. Third-party contact, enhanced verification or expanded investigative work would require a separate scope.
No. The service uses lawful open-source and publicly or otherwise legitimately available information.
No. Open-source research can corroborate or undermine transaction claims but cannot guarantee that funds exist or that a transfer will occur.
If the transaction meets the relevant requirements, you may separately engage Financely for receiving-structure and execution services.
Financely advises post-revenue businesses on accessing capital by presenting opportunities to professional investors, coordinating when needed with regulated broker-dealers, investment banks, and legal counsel. We are not a broker-dealer, do not solicit or accept securities orders, serve only B2B clients, and make no assurance of capital-raising outcomes.
For trade finance, project finance, commercial real estate, or business acquisition mandates, submit a request for quote with a concise deal summary and supporting documents. Our team will review and provide a tailored proposal within 1 to 3 business days.
All Rights Reserved | Financely| Privacy Policy| Refund Policy| Terms of Service| AML| General Disclaimer| Earnings Disclaimer| Blog | Phishing & Security